Contact Jamie

Use the form on the right to contact Jamie Gloor. 

14 Plattenstrasse
Kreis 7, ZH, 8032

Jamie L Gloor is an experienced, international researcher, educator and mentor. She is American born but currently resides in Zurich, Switzerland. Her research interests focus on individual and organizational health, including publications on diversity and leadership and research experience at prestigious universities across four different continents. 


Exciting news, research, updates, & events!


Filtering by Tag: Die Hard

Optimism, Bayes, & Bruce Willis Blockbusters

Jamie Gloor

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me three times, statistically significant.
— SAS (@AcademicsSay)1

Optimism is inherently dangerous in some cases, approaching a near “madness of insisting that all is well when we are miserable” (Voltaire).2 Bayesian analysis snowballs scientific evidence, and is currently new (to me). Ostensibly unrelated, these concepts can combine as a charming yet consequential cocktail of expectations and sense-making.

For example, as a “Die Hard” optimist,3 I should have a few advantages measured in psychological health (e.g., eliminating or reducing stressors and negative emotions; Nes & Segerstrom, 2006),4 and physical health (e.g., survival and cardiovascular outcomes; Rasmussen, Scheier, & Greenhouse, 2009).5 However, recent evidence from my field suggests that state-based or 'little' optimism—not trait-based or 'big' optimism—gives the competitive edge for job-related outcomes (Kluemper, Little, & DeGroot, 2009),6 and state-based optimism is rooted in domain-specific experience.

This is where Bayes comes into the picture. Bayesian analysis is a statistical approach that allows us to use informative priors7 to update our knowledge about the specific likelihood of a particular outcome. Hence, unlike the run of the mill null hypothesis testing typically found in our field (i.e., the statistical approach that can only tell us if we’re likely to have obtained a particular result, assuming the null is true), Bayes estimates the actual likelihood of a particular result and provides a more accurate estimate by integrating previous information—it’s like a mini meta-analysis every time!8

So, coming full circle (and returning to my opening quote), being fooled once can be written off as a mistake or a misunderstanding—these things happen to the best of us, right? Being fooled twice, well, that could still be overlooked by a trait optimist or perhaps even attributed to circumstance (it ALWAYS comes back to context in my field of research). But after being fooled three times, a null hypothesis tester and eternal optimist might return to the former (false) explanation, whereas a Bayesian includes the two informative priors, deciding instead that duplicity is highly probable. At this point, even big, trait optimists must carefully incorporate a little, state optimism to realize that it’s time to move on or risk becoming the fool.

After all, it's live free or die hard...right Bruce?


1. @AcademicsSay on Twitter, March 28, 2016.
2. Voltaire quotes from Brainy Quote

3. Yes, those are strategically chosen words to conjure images of Bruce Willis versus Hans Gruber (and others) throughout the 5(!) movie series. Now for an unrelated, but necessary point: RIP, Alan Rickman, the most likeable villain and authentic actor throughout the Harry Potter series.
4. Nes, L. S., & Segerstrom, S. C. (2006). Dispositional optimism and coping: A mea-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 235-251.
5. Rasmussen, H. N., Scheier, M. F., & Greenhouse, J. B. (2009). Optimism and physical health: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 37, 239-256.
6. Kluemper, D. H., Little, L. M., & DeGroot, T. (2009). State or trait: Effects of state optimism on job-related outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2), 209-231.
7. Or not—Bayes is so flexible that uninformative priors are also possible! For more information about Bayes, see the special issue on Bayesian Probability and Statistics published in the Journal of Management by Zyphur, Oswald, & Rupp (2015).
8. Is it so obvious?! I’m incredibly excited about this new technique and am currently using it for one of my papers!